This is National Discovery Channel. We are not Discovery. Nor are we National Geographic Channel.

What happened to Radha after Krishna left Vrindavan?

Did Lord Krishna marry Radha? What happened to Radha after Krishna left her? Did they meet again? These questions are always remaining a puzzle in our religious history. Even the Purans are silent about this. Srimati Radha is a mysterious character in Hinduism. Some significant facts of her life are justified to mention here in order to meet the lost truth about her. These facts are:
 
a. She is incarnation of Goddess Laxmi.
b. The word "Srimati" is kept before her name.
c. Her birthday is celebrated as "Radha Ashthami".
d. She was elder than Krishna.
e. She was in love with Krishna from her younger age.
f. She was Krishna's most favorite.
g. She is the strength of Krishna
h. It is said that she had secret Gandarva marriage with Krishna.
i. She is the principle consort of Lord Krishna.
j. It is said that someone had cursed her to be separated from Krishna.
k. Her parents forced her to marry with another but she protested it.
l. She looked very beautiful.
m. Her love to Krishna had no bound.

There is no matter of doubt that Radha is the incarnation of Goddess Laxmi and Krishna is that of Lord Vishnu. In every incarnation Laxmi, in word of herself, can be the wife of only Vishnu. So it is absolutely right that God Brahma made Radha and Krishna get married secretly in the forest. Krishna had gone Mathura promising to Radha that he would be come back soon. But the chapter of Radha was closed then after. Radha became like a side character of a movie disappearing after the interval. Did Krishna come back to Radha? Why he married Rukmini? The question becomes more difficult which can't be answered without analyzing the life of Rukmini.

Srimati Rukmini was the daughter of Vismaka, the king of Vidharba. She heard the story of Krishna from her early life. She loved Krishna and hopped that one day he would come, meet and marry her. But her brother Rukmi forced her to marry with Shishupal, the prince of his neighboring kingdom but she protested. She sent a letter to Krishna saying him to steal her away. She also mentioned in letter that if Krishna did not come, she would commit suicide as she loved Krishna and she could marry Krishna only. Finally, Krishna came and abducted her.

Some questions arise here. Krishna loved Radha. He had promised Radha to come back {see how Krishna left Radha}. So Radha was waiting Krishna in Vrindavan. But instead of going to Vrindavan, Krishna went Vidharba and married Rukmini. According to this story Krishna and Rukmini had never met each other. How did Krishna become ready to marry Rukmini whom he had never seen? Rukmini was ready to die in love of Krishna. How a person can love someone so deeply without seeing? Krishna's glory was famous everywhere. Many princesses might be ready to die for him if they could get Krishna as their life partner. Could Krishna marry all of them? Never, But one letter of Rukmini easily made Krishna take risk to steal her from marriage ceremony. This proves that Krishna and Rukmini already had love relationship. They had already met each other for several times but when?

The most reliable source of Hinduism 'Mahabharat' has clearly read Rukmini as incarnation of Goddess Laxmi and the queen of Krishna. Rukmini is also regarded as the incarnation of Radha in Hindu Society. There are many aspects of the life of Rukmini which absolutely match with the life of Radha. Some of them are:
a. She is incarnation of Goddess Laxmi.
b. The word "Srimati" is kept before her name.
c. Her birthday is celebrated as "Rukmini Ashthami".
d. She was elder than Krishna.
e. She was in love with Krishna from her younger age.
f. She was Krishna's most favorite.
g. She is the strength of Krishna.
h. She had Gandarva marriage with Krishna.
i. She is the principle consort of Lord Krishna.
j. It is said that she was cursed by sage Durvasa to be separated from Krishna.
k. She was forced by her brother to marry with Sishupal but she protested.
l. She looked very beautiful.
m. Her love to Krishna had no bound.

The above features give us hints that Radha and Rukmini might have been same character. They are not different at all. Rukmini is just spiritual representation of Radha. They are one. That's why when Krishna is depicted with Radha we don’t see Rukmini and when he is depicted with Rukmini we don’t see Radha both in temples and old pictures. Moreover, we can notice the idols of Rukmini and Radha. They look same. Likewise, the word 'Radha' is nowhere in any ancient scriptures including Mahabharat. Even 'Srimad Vagawat', the story of Krishna has no mention of Radha. Neither is she mentioned in any Purans written in the Chaitanya era.

But Mahabharat describes an unknown Gopi who is the favorite of Krishna whom he plays with as a young boy. She is described as special to Krishna. And the unknown Gopi might have been Rukmini who is described as Radha in latest scriptures like Padma Puran, Gita Govinda etc. That's why till 18th century we don’t find Radha Krishna temples. We find only Krishna temples.

Srimati Rukmini was a princess, the daughter of King Vishmaka where as Radha was a simple cowherd girl, the daughter of Vrishvanu. If Rukmini and Radha are same, then how a person can have two identities and two parents? This question can play in the mind of any one. Vishmaka may be the real parents of Rukmini. There was an evil called Putana who used to kill the children by making them suck her poisonous milk. Putana snatched a divine child Rukmini from Vidharba .But as she was flying Rukmini became excessively heavy. Putana left her into the lotus flower. Then she was found by Vrishvanu and her wife Kriti. Then they accepted her as their daughter who is renowned as Radha today. When Krishna left Vrindavan, king Vishmaka is known with this truth that Radha is his lost daughter, so he took her with him. Krishna knew it so he married Rukmini, his Radha. This is the main reason the ending of Radha is mystery whereas ending of Rukmini is clearly mentioned. There is another point to be considered that in the one hand the early life of Rukmini before she married Krishna is unknown and in the other hand Radha's story is vanished when Krishna left Vrindavan. It means when there was Radha, there was no Rukmini. Similarly, when there was Rukmini, there was no Radha. In this way it is proved that Radha and Rukmini are same.

Krishna, infect, is all love, truth, peace, service, ideal, friendship and simplicity whereas Radha is female manifestation of those same qualities. If Krishna is sun, Radha is sunlight. If Krishna is Shaktiman, Radha is Shakti. Shree Krishna is the soul of Radha and Radha is surely soul of Shree Krishna. Shree Radha is the feminine aspects of Shree Krishna and is non-different from Krishna. They are one not different. Shree Radha is the presiding goddess of Shree Krishna and Shree Krishna is the god of Shree Radha. When we study the mythological meaning, the names Radha and Krishna have same meaning. In Krishna Story, Krishna and Radha wear dress of each other. And Radha becomes Krishna and Krishna becomes Radha. This story has clear proof and sign that they are one. The word Radha means the greatest lover and worshiper of Krishna. So Radha is Krishna's dream girl, his god and even music. Krishna finds Radha in his flute and song. And he finds Radha in his beloved. So he lovingly calls his beloved as Radha or Radhika.
Discovered by +Don Prince

112 comments:

  1. very much convincing but i dont find Radha n Rukmni be same.

    ReplyDelete
  2. very much convincing. but still i dont find Radha n Rukmni to be same.

    ReplyDelete
  3. very much convicing. but i still disagree with the fact that Radha n Rukmni were same.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks, but what is your opinion?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. it is believed that Radha married Abhimanyu.......do u have any reply

      Delete
    2. But what interestingly u have written this made me to think more
      Whatever you have think its excellent

      Delete
    3. if radha and rukmani was same, why kriahna left varindavan by promising radha he will back...

      Delete
  5. Why krishna choose rukmini? Even other princess love krishna.
    Only rukmini were going to su'cide nd other princess?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Your queries are answered completely in this article. Please read the article again. Or email me for detail.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But my friend Radha is village girl who don't know the life of princess. So how come she easily accustomed with life of mahararani

      Delete
  7. do you have any evidence to prove radha and rukmini are same?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yes, I certainly have some proofs.

    ReplyDelete
  9. what makes you conclude radha was rukmani?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Monali
      Read the article again, you will get answer

      Delete
    2. Radha is not Rukmani they are not the same

      Delete
  10. 10 VARIOUS THOUGHTS, 10 VARIOUS OPINION, RHESE THINGS HAVE RACKED MY MIND.. WHAT KIND OF RELIGION IS THIS?? THIER HISTORY IS NOT MATCH WITH EACH OTHER.. I AM PUZZLED...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hinduism is the oldest religion of the world. Naturally it is very difficult to understand it. Research is still going on. History itself is a puzzle, either political history or religious, am I right?

      Delete
    2. yes sir u r 101% right

      Delete
    3. Hinduism is not a religion, its just a way of living the life.... If you read mahabharat or ramayana ... they mention Dharma and Adharma.... Dharma here is not religion but the discovery of truth.... All it says is perform your duties(Karma Yoga) righteously .... dissolve your self in to Devin god (Bhakti Yoga).... Selfless love.... and do not expect anything back....

      Delete
    4. Only sanatan dharma is our religion..it has mentioned in bhagwad geeta

      Delete
  11. thnx for giving the ans of my lots of ques about radha ji n rukmaniji......i was very confused about the radhaji when krishna lft the virandhavan....

    ReplyDelete
  12. Radha Does Not exist, Its a garden Name. Krishna Didn't married Radha.

    ReplyDelete
  13. As I know....Bhagwan ShriKrushna was only 8 years old when left vrundavan And Radha was married girl... There is only relation of god and devotee.(ParaBhakti) Radha-Krushna is name of Bhakta-God.
    @
    http://www.hindujagruti.org/hinduism/knowledge/article/what-is-the-real-relationship-between-radha-and-sri-krushna.html

    ReplyDelete
  14. Thank you Don for this valuable information.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Nice info abt this fact as i was trying to know abt both these character...from a time ago..

    Thanks a lot

    ReplyDelete
  16. But, I read Radha gets married to Ayun later on .. how do you explain that if Radha and Rukmini are the same?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Supraja T
      I will write another article on this topic later.

      Delete
  17. why you people are so much confused about these things ?
    i hate krishna bcz. he left my sweet radha rani and vrindavan :(
    that's it...
    But you know , he also suffer without radha, vrindavan and his Friends ...
    next time when he will come to me ... i will convey your message to your God :))
    it's kalyug time and everybody is running after God only :(
    everybody is running after knowledge :(
    but nobody want to love Radha & Krishna :(

    even sometimes krishna do bad things but we always forgive him ...

    you know why ?

    Bcz. his eyes are very beautiful and whenever he come face to face ,,,

    We forget all our anger and sadness and he make us fool again in his love :(

    Anyways ... i stop here ... otherwise you will start hating him also ... loolzzz

    Regards and Love ,

    Vicky :))



    Okay :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. radha rani ko 100 saal tk krishna s alg rhne ka shrap mila tha or ye shrap unhe krishna ji k dost sudhama ne diya tha, 100 saal bad jab krishna ji vapas aye radha rani s milne tb krishna ji ne sabhi gopio or dosto ko bhi bulaya tha unse milne. milne ke bad jab krishna ji laut kar jane lge to radha rani ne gusse s krishna ji s pucha ke apne mjse shadi kyu nhi ki tb krishna ji ne mudkar unki taraf dkha or radha rani hairan rh gyi unhe dekhkr...kyuki jb vo mude to krishna ji nhi radha rani ka roop dhrey the or unhone kha main or tum kbi alg the he nhi radha .or y dkh kr radha rani ke ankh bhar ayi.

      Delete
    2. radha or rukmini was not same

      Delete
    3. oh hello...who the hell r u to speak wrong words about Krishna....
      and on the other hand u r praising radha rani...do u really think that radha rani will like ur such words about Krishna

      Delete
  18. I'm little bit convince that radha and rukmani were same.....bt in the other end, as u say that if radha does nt exist or she's jst an imagination, then how the peoples knw her..?? bcoz she is jst an imagination fr krishna bt fr others....who is she..?? nd y krishna do this.....in our religion always women has to face prblms.....it is in our root... radhika....the mysterious girl

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't say Radha did not exist. She was existed but in the form of Rukmini. People treated Radha and Rukmini as two personalities. So there was confusion.

      Delete
    2. K. Then, y there is confusion...?? if radha and rukmini are same, so there faces are also same.....so how the people didn't recognize radha, when they see radha as rukmani...??

      Delete
    3. Story of Radha and Krishna is not written on the basis of eyes witness. So who knows people at that time were confused or not.

      Delete
  19. Radha was married to someone else. So what happened to that guy? What is your evidence that Radha & Rukmini are the same person? Just because we can't find story about Radha after Krishna left her in Vrindawan or story about Rukmani's childhood is not considered evidence.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am writing another article about it.

      Delete
    2. please send me a copy to nmarch@hotmail.com

      Delete
    3. Radha died of sorrow in the river no body will say it because it makes Krishna a bad person

      Delete
  20. I am interested to read your another article.
    Please inform me at "darshit.jogiya@yahoo.com" whenever you publish it.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Mr. Darshit, I have added you in Google+, add me back, I am sharing my all new articles there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, I can't seem to find this article...do you mind giving me the link Please?

      Delete
    2. Thank you
      http://www.nationaldiscoverychannel.com/2013/12/the-reality-behind-marriage-of-radha.html

      Delete
  22. love your article and wanna to read more on it. Kindly notify me on cmgoel143@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  23. Liked this one, i had this confusion from childhood and now its increased , please let me know when your new article is released on ushassoni@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  24. very convincing..
    when you r going to publish yr nxt articl?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You had better subscribe us in social networks using the buttons at the top of this site. In this way you will not miss any article from this site.

      Delete
  25. This is not convincing at all as radha is 8 year older than krishna. Then how come pootna tries to kill radha as she was already a grown up girl.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Putana was killing babies like that from ages.

      Delete
  26. Radha was married with Anay so that Radha and Rukmini not same personality

    ReplyDelete
  27. love is god love is life who can deny woow krsna raadha love story woow Don Prince @national discovery channel

    ReplyDelete
  28. Some readers are giving email so that I can email them my new article. I think you had better signup newsletter with the help of menu above or subscribe with social networking icons above. In that way you won't miss any article.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Do anybody have proov evn about rukmini and krushna marruage

    ReplyDelete
  30. Its interesting. . But I want to know that how radha married krishana when radha was married yo another guy.. how can radha nd rukmani b the same.. kindly send me the link to this article..

    ReplyDelete
  31. Yes rukaman was in jail by his brother and father
    Then write a letter for krishana for got marry
    And choose a brahman for forward latter to krishana
    Krishana received a letter at midnight

    Rukman letter for shree krishana.....

    ReplyDelete
  32. rupmini and radha is different personality.....infact radha is ahalidini shakti known as divine love and rupmini is laxmi radha is not laxmi....she is soul of krishna .....radha is love where krishna is Bliss (anando brahmeti vyajnyat )....
    (radha=prem+krishna =anand )=(radha+krishna)=(prem+anand)=premanand

    ReplyDelete
  33. The absolute supreme Divinity is Shri Radha, Who is the absolute essence of Divine love. Her other form is Krishna, Who descended on this earth 5,000 years ago, at the end of the age of dwapar.Whatever is Radha, the same is Krishna. Do not differentiate between them. Radha is the supreme ahaladini shakti or Divine love power, Krishna is shaktiman, the base in which the power resides.
    Radhopanishad is saying that the personality whom Shri Krishna worships, is known as Radha. And the personality whom Radha worships, is known as Krishna. Both worship one another. The Vedas are saying that one personality has assumed two forms. Again, Radhopanishad states, "Radha and Krishna have one intellect, one mind, one soul, and even one face. They have one knowledge. This is why there is no difference between these two. If someone thinks there to be a difference, it is an offence." It is a different matter altogether that someone says it from the point of view of nectar-but to actually think that Radha is greater, or Krishna is greater, leads one to a hell named Kalasutra for as long as the sun and the moon are in existence, in other words, till the dissolution of the universe. Considering Radha and Krishna to be different is such a serious offence. So, both are the same.
    Narad Pancharatram states that She is the Supreme Personality, beyond whom there is no other. Vrishbhanu’s daughter, Radha, is the primordial nature, from whom everything came into being. ‘Ra’ and ‘Dha’ mean, “one who creates, one who preserves, and one in whom creation merges.
    Narad Pancharatram again states that Shri Krishna’s half part is Radha, and Radha’s half part is Krishna. Shri Krishna says, “I have assumed the form of Radha.” Radha Ji says, “I have assumed the form of Krishna.” Radha is saying, “The form of Krishna is none other than Myself.” “When I assumed the male form, people started calling me Shri Krishna.”

    ReplyDelete
  34. So, again, Narad Pancharatra says that Just as milk and milk’s whiteness are the same, likewise Radha and Krishna are the same. The whiteness of milk cannot and should not be separated from milk itself. In the same way, no one can separate milk from the whiteness. Both are the same.
    Again, Narad Pancharatra says that Mahalakshmi, the consort of Mahavishnu, the creator of countless universes, was manifested from Radha’s left side. Durga, Jayanti, Kali, Bhadrakali, Kapalini, Durga, Kshama, Shivadhatri, Svaha, Tvadha, and Vaishnavi are all born from fractions of Kishori Ji.
    Countless Vishnus are born from the toenails of Kishori Ji, not just one.
    Ved-Vyas Ji explained the meaning of the name ‘Radha.’ The one who fulfills desires of an individual who sheds a few tears, is known as Radha. This is in the Brahma Vaivarta Puran. Devi Bhagavat Puran says, "First utter the name of Radha; then Krishna. One who does keertan in this manner, attains Golok." Radha’s name is uttered first. No one says KRISHNA RADHA. Everyone says RADHA KRISHNA or SHYAMA SHYAM. So, the word Radha is described in many places. Rasik saints have spoken so much on Radha that there is no end to what they have said. In our Braj there came great Jagadgurus, great Acharyas, like Vallabhacharaya and Nimbarkacharya, Gaurang Mahaprabhu, Ramanujacharya, Madhavacharya. Madhvacharya and Raanujacharya, these two Jagadgurus, were devotees of Lakshmi-Narayan. The remaining saints and acharyas of Braj were all devoted to Radha-Krishna. Madhvacharya was devotee of Lakshmi-Narayan. His disciple Madhavendra Puri was devotee of Radha-Krishna. His disciple Ishvar Puri was a devotee of Radha-Krishna, and his disciple Gaurang Mahaprabhu was also a devotee of Radha-Krishna.
    So, only Vallabhacharya says only one thing, and that is that Radha is not equal to God, and that She is God Herself. She is Brahm Herself. And Nimbarkacharya says that Radha is the power, and Krishna is the powerful one. According to him, power and the powerful one are non-different but also different from one another. This is why both are one and also two. Gaurang Mahaprabhu says that Radha and Krishna are eternally two, and eternally one and the same. This is to say that all Acharyas are accepting Radha and Krishna to be one and the same. Even Ramanujacharya and Madhvacharya, who are devotees of Lakshmi-Narayan, also write in their respective philosophies that Mahalakshmi is worshipped as Radha also.
    So, this is why we must not think Radha and Krishna to be two separate entities, but from the point of view, Radha is more important. — at Where was this photo taken?

    ReplyDelete
  35. I m not convinced with u ..de are not same ..nd Krishna doesn't thought of randha but he was sad about rukmani ..dis fact is not convinced

    ReplyDelete
  36. I think your analysis is brilliant. It's incredible to me how absolutely no one else has uncovered the discrepancies you have! Or if they have, is there a conspiracy to keep silent about it, to protect the wrongdoings of their own kind? It is common knowledge that all of these texts, the Vedas, Puranas etc have been tampered with. In the words of an expert, they have been filled with novel and erroneous ideas, and lost their primitive purity.

    The beautiful and pure concept of "twin flames" that Radha and Krishna are trying to exemplify has been twisted until it makes no sense at all. Both Radha and Krishna seem to have lost their way and blundered into holding up some hollow and nonsensical ideals at the cost of the true love that they are supposed to represent. Why did a loveless marriage mean more to Radha than a union with Krishna? Why did she not accompany him on his journey and accept her rightful place by his side as queen? A multi-faceted, talented and loving soul like her ... are we supposed to believe she suffered from an inferiority complex? Why are we supposed to idealize a love that she herself didn't believe in enough? If they are one and the same in spirit, and earthly unions mean so little, why did they meet in the flesh at all - for sexual pastimes alone? Seriously, why would divine lovers incarnate on this planet just to have infinitely good sex!? Wouldn't they want to help each other grow as human beings? If they did not marry, and if we don't need marriage for that, then what is the purpose of marriage at all? Why is it so important to honor soul-mate contracts (like those with our other family etc) at the cost of a true twin flame reunion on the earth, which embodies the highest love of all, and whose togetherness, mutual growth and commonality of purpose and vision could potentially create miracles?

    ReplyDelete
  37. The only way this makes perfect sense is if the whole ending of the story, starting from the time Krishna married "Rukmini" is a perversion by lame-brained vested interests, and I have a theory as to who is responsible. Polyandry was a fairly common practice in those times, along with other so called evils like polygamy, group marriage etc. Radha and Krishna had a Gandharva marriage, which according to Narada, is best for everyone including the Brahmins, calling it sadharna; Narada claims the only methods of marriage that are wrong are those that are based on kidnapping, violence, fraud or purchase. It is the ONLY one of the eight acceptable forms of marriage which upholds the principles of love, free will and the unconditional empowerment of women. Then why did it go out of fashion? It is very likely that the priestly caste of India, who officiated Brahma marriages and religious ceremonies, over time crafted rules that declared Gandharva marriage for most Hindus as inappropriate and disapproved (aprasasta), because traditional marriages were a source of their income, and Gandharva marriages made them poorer or obsolete! We don't know if these vested interests rigged these texts in an attempt to make marriages more Manu-style, to give themselves an importance out of proportion to their function, which promoted order in society but fired a salvo on women's freedom to choose their mates in keeping with the shift towards a rigid, more controlling patriarchial setup. Thus, the subverted tale of Radha's pining away for her lover could serve as a warning to all young girls who wished to engage in consensual marriages and partnerships with eligible men... a promise that they will be united with their beloveds in an afterlife but here on the earth, they had better function within the patriarchial setup or woe would become them. It becomes a most predictible outcome then, to see the priestly class vastly elevated and marriages of mutual consent dwindling down over a few generations, which IS exactly what happened (not entirely due to subversion alone, but this evidently played a huge part in it).

    ReplyDelete
  38. Imagine: NOT perverting the scriptures and allowing Radha to keep her name would have sent out the message: Polyandry is acceptable. Following your heart is wonderful. Your sexual freedom will be respected. Gandharva marriages are beautiful and pure. Ideas like this are a major threat to the fabric of patriarchal society, and can never be encouraged by the power structures that seek to establish themselves as the gatekeepers of wisdom.

    Unfortunately for the manipulators though, they seem to have done a hash job and forgotten to change a number of identifying details which really give the game away!! All it takes is someone willing to dig deep enough, to set aside his personal beliefs and examine the evidence objectively, and the truth comes tumbling out of this very messy closet. To the author: Your analysis rings completely true with me. Again, commendable job :-))

    ReplyDelete
  39. But what about that 100 year separation curse given to radha...if they both are same then how could radha can get married with Krishna as she already had a curse of separation about 100 year of...waiting for your reply.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The curse escaped coincidently when the sad story of Radha and Krishna continued as the happy story of Rukmini and Krishna. After all Krishna is the real God. Even a leaf of a tree can't move without his desire, how can the poor curse stand against him?

      Delete
    2. Thanks alot.... I am convinced that "he sad story of Radha and Krishna continued as the happy story of Rukmini and Krishna. " :)

      Delete
    3. During the yug of krishna normal life span of human is 1000 yrs, during ram yug life span of human is 10000 yrs, in kalyug human life span is 100 yrs and kalyug ends when the human life span becomes 20yrs and satyug will start again, so it's possible radha separated for 100yrs in her lifespan and later married as a rukmani, search articles on yug you will get ur ans

      Delete
    4. During the yug of krishna normal life span of human is 1000 yrs, during ram yug life span of human is 10000 yrs, in kalyug human life span is 100 yrs and kalyug ends when the human life span becomes 20yrs and satyug will start again, so it's possible radha separated for 100yrs in her lifespan and later married as a rukmani, search articles on yug you will get ur ans

      Delete
    5. Satyug mey normal age 100,000yr hoti thi, treta yug(ram bhagwan) mey 10000yr, dwapar yug(krishna age) were 1000yr, kalyug (today)100yrs is the lifespan of human being as per yugas and when life span of human becomes 20yrs the kalyug ends and satyug will come again, so 100 yrs of separation is possible and curses never fails even for God's,

      Delete
  40. Thanks Don for this great information......i agreed.......waiting for your coming article.

    ReplyDelete
  41. thanks for your reply.... i don't agree with your words on curse......
    certain rules are made to follow in universe to follow by human and even gods also.....
    curse is curse ------ex:....tulasi has cursed lord vishnu to convert into idol......which is followed by lord vishnu without any deviation......

    plz mail me records which are available with u that rukmini and radha are same.........

    am eagerly waiting for your reply..............plz reply ..........................plz............

    ReplyDelete
  42. I am not agree with your story that what you tried to prove radha and rukmini are same. A good story but you can't justify it. Neither Geeta Mahabharata or any Veda upanishad never reveal this theory what you tried to show as a story. The reasons you show to prove is not much it is only for balancing your story to make a history. But its not so simple. It is only a story what you wrote. But you tried to know that is great.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Hello Don Prince, you seem to be a nice person and with the spiritual mind. I congratulate you for opening the nice topic.
    One can have his opinion about what one "thinks" may be the reality. However the super human behavior of the Supreme Lord is very difficult to conceive by mundane brain. That is why we attempt to understand and learn Krishna's activities, past time ( Janma Karma Cha me divyam) from the bonafide scriptures. There are 3 ways to learn the spiritual knowledge which is beyond the conception of material senses : Sadhu, Shastra and Guru. All the self realized persons (acharyas) have confirmed that Radha Rani is the internal potency of Lord SriKrishna whereas Srimati Rukmini devi is the incarnation of Srimati Lakshmi devi.
    Without taking the shelter of the scriptures our knowledge is not complete. Whatever we may "think" with our imperfect senses is nothing but mental speculation if not authorized by the scriptures.
    All those who think Radha Rani and Srimati Rukmini devi are same should attempt to understand it from the scripture such as Srimad Bhagvatam. That is the right way to understand Krishna and His past time. Krishna advises us in Bhagvat Gita how to gain the knowledge without getting confused in this material world.
    I request you all to please, please, please attempt to read Bhagvat Gita and Srimad Bhagvatam and all the questions you may have will be answered.

    May the sweetest Lord SriKrishna bless you all.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Radha and rukmini are not same.radha had her own family, after krishna went to mathura,she was very upset.and many days she just break her own totaly. but krishna not come again, but she still loving him.then she doing married with someone other, but she was not happy with him.her husbend love her too much but she love krishna.Krishna is our respected god, but he doing many mistake in his life becouse he born as a human.its not god he is our god for thats why only we neglect his mistakes.thats not good. radha is very innocent and she is a original a lovable character, for her its not possible to forgot her parents. in ramayan ram sita was not live happily at the end of ramayan.sita went to her her mother place.and ram in ayodhya.becouse ram doing bad with sita. and same here krishna doing bad with radha, and they not live happily at the end of Krishnah life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you but Radha didnt have a family after Krishna

      Delete
  45. Can u plzz send me ur next article.@ gswati3006@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Swati ji if you do not want to miss my article, you can download app, like facebook like page, subscribe the blog or bookmark it. These are the best ways to keep in touch.

      Delete
    2. Dear prince your justification have some sense about Radha and Rukmini, and these discussions enlarges the not just Radha or Rukmini but the jurisdiction of thought process, I will love to read you further kindly add my account * gururajhappy@gmail.com*

      Delete
  46. I would suggest all sincerely interested parties read Srimad Bhagavatam purports by ISKCON's Found-Acharya A.C. Bhaktivedanta Prabhupada to end all confusions and speculations. He is meticulously explained everything in there from various Vedic scriptures. You may also read these two articles for a quick review http://mayapurvoice.com/svagatam/knowing-more-about-srimati-radha-on-radhastami-day-2/ and http://mayapurvoice.com/svagatam/mundaners-can-never-understand-radha-krishna/

    ReplyDelete
  47. no radha or rukmani are not same girl,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is what mom told me.
      Rukmini when small was kidnapped by kaputana ( one who tried to breast feed Krishna and kill him). When Kaputana flew high in the sky Rukmini ji started increasing weight, unable to bear the weight she dropped Rukmini ji down where she was found by gwaliars who took her as their own and named her Radha. When she grew up the king came to know that her daughter is alive and claimed her back. Both Rukmini and Radha are same and that is why Krishna claimed his love for Rukmini.

      Delete
  48. I am totally not agree on this article..I have heard a lots of different stories about Radha & Krishna..I am not satisfied about all the story..There should be any conventional evidence or story which would give some sense of reality about Radha..

    ReplyDelete
  49. Don't give wrong information. Please learn the facts before writing something. There are many puranas where srimati Radharani is mentioned. Lord brahma himself did a penance for srimati Radharani for many billions of years and yet he could see only tip of thumb finger's nail. It is mentioned in srimadbagavatam, devi bagavatam too. Please don't write your own analysis. Srimati Radharani is the shakti, from which lordess lakshmi comes. Learn the facts. Hare krishna

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Radha did not exist. Can you quote from the puranas as you are insisting that she did exist?

      Delete
  50. It's great to get chance to learn about devine love of Radha Krishna....Thank you so much for ur research

    ReplyDelete
  51. Hi,
    Please send me all your articles on kiran.patil@siem.org.in

    I am grateful I came across this article.

    Regards,
    Kiran

    ReplyDelete
  52. The way it really is, is most probably a lot different than we understand it to be, any of us, no matter who gave us our information.

    The way I have understood it is that we all have a relationship with that greatest of all beings, and that each of us, in our deepest heart holds tight to a particular mood of Him. And that the most important thing in our life is to find what is already there in our own heart, to remember Him. To remember Him is to find life. To not remember Him is the most miserable of all conditions.

    The radha Krishna pastimes are written down to help people remember He Who is the most enchanting of all, while the rukmini visnu pastimes are written down to help people remember He Who is the greatest of all. Radha and rukmini give us a glimpse of different moods, and can help us find Love hidden in our own heart.

    ReplyDelete
  53. https://www.quora.com/What-happened-to-Radha-after-Krishna-moved-to-dwarka-What-were-highlights-of-her-later-life

    ReplyDelete
  54. yea great info... i understand what you mean.... they are alterego of each other... radha is alterego of rukmani...

    ReplyDelete
  55. Great information shared by you Don Prince. I do believe that Radha and Rukmani are same. I personally Don't believe that krishna will marry some other person and make his wife, Ramayana is the proof of love between Lord Rama and Deity Sita (i.e. incarnation of Lord Vishnu and Deity Laxmi), We know that before leaving for mathura Krishna promised Radha that he will come back for her, so guys Gods don't make false promises.

    Thanks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is what mom told me.
      Rukmini when small was kidnapped by kaputana ( one who tried to breast feed Krishna and kill him). When Kaputana flew high in the sky Rukmini ji started increasing weight, unable to bear the weight she dropped Rukmini ji down where she was found by gwaliars who took her as their own and named her Radha. When she grew up the king came to know that her daughter is alive and claimed her back. Both Rukmini and Radha are same and that is why Krishna claimed his love for Rukmini.

      Delete
  56. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Interesting, we should know about this, let us find more. Let me know if you find something else.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Interesting, we should know about this, let us find more. Let me know if you find something else.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Excited and extremely happy, and thankful that my marriage with my husband has been restored. me and my husband have been married of 22 years together 23. After i found him texting a coworker and questioned him, he said they were just friends but 3 wks later he told me he didnt love me anymore that he was in love with her and that i made him feel bad about himself and she didnt. He left home for 2 wks came home and left 2 wks later. Been gone for 3 1/2 months now. Hes been going to bars, calling women, lying like crazy, drinking like a fish and hasnt spoken to the kids the whole time hes been gone. His whole personality has changed. We believe he is going thru some sort of mid life crisis. Its crazy, he is acting like a person that we dont know anymore. Is it possible to get my marriage back. Because I know that he is going thru some crazy thing right now Im finding it very hard to let go. I still love him. How can I save my marriage and family when my husband is in the middle of a mid life crisis and wont listen to my or anyone else. We are so confused. i try to communicate with him but still hang off the phone on me,I love my family. and my husband and i need to keep my marriage save with him from other women so i have to seek for a love spell to keep our marriage stronger and safe so going online one day on facebook, i saw a prayer point, and a website say if you need your ex back, save your marriage, and fight your husband from divorce. i was so very happy a hopeful again that i can get back with my husband after i saw this website so i read this testimony of this website on how he help save his marriage nd i was excited to give a try so i contacted him and give him all the reason why i need his help, and he assured me that with-6 good hours of his spell that my husband will come back home to me so i believe and trust him coz he was like a father to me also a man of his words so today am happy that my husband who has been away for 3 1/2 months now with his coworker is back home with apology plz you all should help me and thank Dr happy he really save my life and my marriage so email him if you need help also on happylovespell2@gmail.com call +2348133873774 about his service and web site: http://happyspelltemple.webs.com/

    ReplyDelete
  60. Best African Love Spell Caster-Get Your EX Lover Back Fast Now By Dr.Unity.
    My wife divorce me, she said that she never wanted to stay with me again,and that she did not love me anymore, So she packed out of my house and made me and my children passed through severe pain. I tried all my possible means to get her back,after much begging,but all to no avail and she confirmed it that she has made her decision,and she never wanted to see me again. One day I came across a website that suggested that Dr.Unity can help solve marital problems, restore broken relationships and so on. So, I felt I should give him a try. I contacted him and told him my problems and the spell caster assured me that i will get my wife back the next 28hours, what an amazing statement!! I never believed,so he spoke with me,and told me everything that i need to do and i did it, Then the next morning, So surprisingly!! my wife who did not call me for the past seven months,gave me a call to inform me that she was coming back So Amazing!! So that was how she came back that same day,with lots of love and joy,and she apologized for her mistake,and for the pain she caused me and my children. Then from that day,our relationship was now stronger than how it were before,by the help of a Dr.Unity.If you have any problem contact Dr.Unity now and i guarantee you that he will help you.Email him at: Unityspelltemple@gmail.com ,you can also call him or add him on Whats-app: +2348071622464 ,His website: http://unityspelltemple.yolasite.com . Mike Robinson from England.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Amazing post. I absolutely agree. It is not only common sense, but also insight into this. Let the others say what they want. The majority is generally wrong about most things anyway. Krishna and Radha were like poetry. And poetry cannot be understood by just anyone.

    ReplyDelete
  62. There is someone, I know, in whose life there is a Radha as well as a Rukmini.

    ReplyDelete
  63. It was really amazing. I was very sure about it....☺☺☺☺��������������������������������������������

    ReplyDelete
  64. Intresting story.... I don't know whether the above information s true or false but.. Your the entire page ws so lovely.. And your effort for this article ws so amazing.. .. So lovely

    ReplyDelete